Skip to main content

You’re not alone. Call 988 to connect to the National Suicide and Crisis Lifeline.

Join Us    |    Contact

CEO Update | 66

CMS Announces 1.5-percent Increase for Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities for 2020 in Final Rule The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced a Medicare payment increase of 1.5 percent next year for inpatient psychiatric facilities in the final Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities Prospective Payment Systems (IPF PPS) rule the agency released earlier this week. Compared with the 2019 payment rate, the increase reflects a total increase of $65 million for Medicare-participating inpatient psychiatric facilities in fiscal year 2020. The payment update aligns with the agency’s proposed rule earlier this year. The rule also adds one new claims-based measured starting in fiscal year 2021 payment determination and continuing in subsequent years. The measure—Medication Continuing Following Inpatient Psychiatric Discharge (National Quality Forum #3205)—assesses whether patients admitted to IPFs with diagnoses of Major Depressive Disorder, schizophrenia, or bipolar disorder filled at least one evidence-based medication within two days before discharge or during the 30-day, post-discharge period.   CMS Proposes Slight Payment Increase for PHPs and CMHCs in 2020 The CMS has proposed a hospital-based partial hospitalization program (PHP) payment rate of $228.20 for 2020, up from the 2019 rate of $220.86, in the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment System (OPPS/ASC) proposed rule the agency released on July 29. CMS also proposed an increase for community mental health centers (CMHCs), which could see a payment rate of $124.59 in 2020 if the rule is made final. By comparison, CMHCs received a payment rate of $120.58 in 2019. The rates set in the proposed CY 2020 rule are not based on the most recent average cost data from the PHP program, a deviation from CMS’ long-standing policy. When CMS calculated the average PHP program cost for the CY 2020 proposed rule, the agency found it had decreased by nearly 15 percent for CMHCs and 11 percent for hospitals-based PHPs. After finding this decrease, CMS reviewed the data sets and found that a single provider in the CMHC set and a single provider in the hospital-based set had such dramatically lower reported costs that it significantly skewed the average cost for both data sets. Because the lower average costs were the result of single providers and could significantly reduce access for beneficiaries, CMS decide to use the CY 2019 cost average as a floor for both type of PHP rates in the CY 2020 rule. If not for this change, the rate for both types of PHPs would have been significantly lower than what CMS proposed in the rule. It is important to note that CMS stressed that it does not intent to carry this policy forward: “To be clear, this policy would only apply for the CY 2020 rate setting,” the agency said in the rule. CY 2020 Rates Level 1 Health and Behavior Services                                                     $28.59 Level 2 Health and Behavior Services                                                     $81.06 Level 3 Health and Behavior Services                                                     $130.27 Partial Hospitalization (3 or more services) for CMHCs                            $124.59 Partial Hospitalization (3 or more services) for Hospital-based PHPs        $228.20   NABH will submit comments on the proposed rule to CMS by the Sept. 27 deadline.   CMS Addresses OUD Treatment in OTPs and Office Settings in Proposed Rule  Also this week, CMS issued a proposed rule for establishing a Medicare Part B benefit and payment bundles for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment services in opioid treatment program (OTP) settings and new HCPCS codes and bundled rates for office-based treatment of OUD.   The proposal implements Section 2005 of the Substance Use Disorder Prevention that Promotes Opioid Recovery and Treatment for Patients and Communities (SUPPORT) Act.   The rule proposes:
  • A definition of OUD treatment services and OTPs, including an explanation that services include access to all FDA-approved medications, counseling and therapy, and toxicology testing;
  • Enrollment policies that align with SAMHSA OTP regulation and that do not have additional conditions of participation;
  • Bundled payment methodologies that separate drug from non-drug treatment components, account for different medications and variable intensity of services, provide for service add-ons and partial- and full-billing for weekly episodes;
  • Use of audio-video communication technology; and
  • Zero beneficiary cost-sharing requirement for a time-limited period.
  The agency also proposed a bundled payment for office-based OUD treatment services, to encourage the expansion of access to OUD care, including:
  • Coverage of OUD management, care coordination, psychotherapy, and counseling; medication to be billed and reimbursed under existing Medicare Part B or D; toxicology testing to be billed under Clinical Lab Fee Schedule;
  • Bundled payment methodologies that are based on monthly billing cycles to better align with office-based practices; one bundle for the initial month of treatment that is more service-intensive; and a second bundle for subsequent “maintenance months,” service add-on codes, and not restricted to addiction specialists;
  • Three new HCPCS codes to Category I of the list of Medicare telehealth services for office-based substance use disorder (SUD)/OUD services, permitting a patient’s home as a telehealth originating site; and
  • No changes to cost-sharing.
  In addition, the proposed rule requests information on emergency department practice patterns related to the initiation and use of MAT, and referral or follow-up care, for developing such bundles in future rulemaking. Comments are due September 27, 2019. NABH has engaged a consulting firm to help analyze the proposed bundled payment methodology and payment rates, and the association will submit comments. CMS Releases Informational Bulletins as Part of the SUPPORT Act CMS late last week released two informational bulletins as part of last year’s SUPPORT Act to provide states with guidance on treatment for infants, expectant mothers, and post-partum women.   In the first bulletin, the agency explains that neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is a “constellation of symptoms in newborn infants exposed to any of a variety of substance in utero, including opioids.” The SUPPORT Act added an optional provider type, a residential pediatric recovery center, defined as a facility that offers items and services for which medical assistance is available under the state plan to infants who have NAS. This brief provides additional information about this condition and the impact of these recovery centers.   Meanwhile, the agency’s second bulletin provides background information about Medicaid coverage for pregnant and post-partum women and examines a new, limited exception to the IMD exclusion.   A section of the SUPPORT Act states that a woman who is eligible on the basis of being pregnant (and up to 60 days post-partum) who is a patient in an IMD for SUD treatment, and who is either enrolled under the state plan immediately before becoming an IMD patient, or who becomes eligible to enroll while a patient in an IMD, the exclusion cannot prohibit federal financial participation for medical assistance for items and services that are provided outside the IMD.   MACPAC Releases Issue Brief on Recovery Services for Medicaid Beneficiaries with SUD The Medicaid and CHIP Payment Commission (MACPAC) this week released an issue brief about recovery support services for Medicaid beneficiaries with SUD.   MACPAC documented coverage for clinical SUD services in the fourth chapter of its Report to Congress on Medicaid and CHIP in June 2018. This week’s issue brief complements that information by presenting results from the commission’s 50-state policy review of coverage for clinical SUD services.   The brief also describes how Medicaid programs pay for recovery support services and discusses opportunities to coordinate clinical treatment and recovery support services.   For questions or comments about CEO Update, please contact Jessica Zigmond.